[time-nuts] Enhancing the TIC232 code for better data
Brooke Clarke
brooke at pacific.net
Sun Aug 13 17:16:54 UTC 2006
Hi Bill & Didier:
I think that Richard is using the tvb divider on his 10 MHz reference to
get to 1 PPS and that has a square wave output.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
--
w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com
Bill Janssen wrote:
>Didier Juges wrote:
>
>
>
>>Second thoughts about inverting the UTC 1PPS. I have read in a previous
>>post that for most GPS receivers, only the leading edge of the 1PPS
>>pulse is tightly controlled (and intended to be synchronous with the
>>satellite signal), the falling edge is not. If this is true, we want to
>>make sure we keep that edge the way it is and then invert the 1PPS from
>>the DUT, if this is possible.
>>
>>Also, at least with my Jupiter receiver, the 1PPS is a fairly short
>>pulse, not nearly 50% duty cycle, so inverting it might not give much
>>improvement.
>>
>>Any thoughts?
>>
>>Didier
>>
>>
>>
>Would it be feasible to clock a flip-flop with the pulse ? that would
>give a 50% duty
>cycle but with one pulse per two seconds. I hate to slow the signal but
>it might be feasible.
>
>Bill K7NOM
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list