[time-nuts] LORAN-C Programmatic environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)?
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Jul 31 05:31:36 UTC 2007
In message <20070730.224033.-1233411867.cfmd at bredband.net>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>Errors-To: time-nuts-bounces+phk=phk.freebsd.dk at febo.com RETRY
>
>From: Rob Kimberley <rk at timing-consultants.com>
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LORAN-C Programmatic environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)?
>Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:59:46 +0100
>Message-ID: <E1IE08o-00037f-3r at febo.com>
>
>> If Galileo flies!
>
>No, in this context it is when Galileo flies. If Galileo flies Loran-C support
>is certainly dead as the service is being acheived with needed goverement
>control where as if Galileo does not flies then there are some arguments to
>continuue Loran-C futher.
You should read the ERNP draft, it points out that LORAN-C is the best investment
of all conceiveable systems.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list