Didier Juges wrote: > Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma. > > Didier KO4BB > > A long s we are being pedantic: 15 ns = 15 nanoseconds, but 15 nS = 15 nanosiemens. I am sure in the time-nuts list, we are concerned with nanoseconds, not nanosiemens!