[time-nuts] OT: NTP server questions
Chris Albertson
albertson.chris at gmail.com
Wed Dec 1 06:32:26 UTC 2010
I had suggested the same thing. In fact I'd argue not having an NTP box is
more reliable than having one. A non-esistant box can't fail.
But don't run just one NTP server, run one on every non-overloaded
server. You clients will automatically sync with whichever server
is "best"
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
>
> 100 systems is falling off a log.
>
> If you have some other server that isn't overloaded, it may be better overall
> to run NTP on that system. The idea is to avoid adding another box just for
> NTP. If you do something like that, you may still need a GPS unit.
--
=====
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list