[time-nuts] Thermal time constant
Joseph M Gwinn
gwinn at raytheon.com
Wed Mar 10 23:07:23 UTC 2010
A better metric may be stored heat for a dollar's worth of material. Scrap
iron is pretty cheap.
From:
Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us>
To:
Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
Date:
03/10/2010 06:03 PM
Subject:
Re: [time-nuts] Thermal time constant
Sent by:
time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
Hi
The gotcha is that you are interested in the amount of heat per cubic foot
rather than the amount of heat per pound. You need to take the standard
heat per weight numbers and convert them to heat per volume numbers.
Of the things you can easily get, copper is good. Steel is not as good as
copper, but better than aluminum.
Bob
On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:52 PM, phil at pseng.org.uk wrote:
> Looking at the specific heat of metals:
> http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html
> Wouldn't Beryllium be better instead of aluminium?
> I could foresee a few problems though eg machining holes at home, never
mind where to get a block from.
>
> Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list