[time-nuts] A real world project need for timing accuracy...
William H. Fite
omniryx at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 02:15:56 UTC 2010
If I may disagree without being disagreeable, it is entirely possible to use
a scope with sufficient resolving power to see target holes at 800m. I
didn't promise it would be cheap. [?]
You're right about the atmospheric instability, of course. And that
instability, in addition to a number of other indeterminate variables is
what will put pay to attempts at exceedingly precise measurements.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Two gotchas, one minor, the other a bit bigger.
>
> At 800 yards, even a *very* good optical setup can't / won't see holes in a
> target. The atmosphere is just to unstable. You would have to mount the
> camera down range (minor issue).
>
> The larger one is that you really don't want to truck down a half mile of
> path to put up a new piece of paper. After a while the "target" gets pretty
> ragged. There's not much for the optics to pick up, especially if you have
> good groups.
>
> Cool idea though ....
>
> Bob
>
>
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Predrag Dukic wrote:
>
> >
> > Why not using optical methods for shot grouping?
> >
> > A cheap web camera with equally cheap telescopic lense can resolve 1mm.
> > Some image processing software can find shot positions within the 1kx1k
> pixel bitmap.... etc..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 01:03 2.11.2010, you wrote:
> >> Timenutters--
> >> I appreciate the feedback for implementing my
> >> ballistic field measurement project but I think
> >> there is some misunderstanding of what the goal is.
> >> For instance, it is not practical to find 800 meters
> >> of coax and trench it in out to the downrange target.
> >> This system needs to be relatively portable so it
> >> can be set up at any given shooting range.
> >> I need to determine: A) down-range velocity of the
> >> still super-sonic projectile, B) time of flight and
> >> C) shot-group size.
> >> Measuring down-range shot-group size with an array of
> >> ultrasonic sensors is pretty straightforward. I can
> >> do all the computation with a $6 microprocessor and
> >> send the X/Y coordinates back to the laptop at the
> >> shooting bench with a simple RF link. Down-range
> >> velocity is easily determined with a set of sky-screens
> >> and the results also sent back via an RF link.
> >> Time-of-flight is much more problematic to determine
> >> but the plan is to determine the elapsed time between
> >> the moment the projectile passes over the muzzle skyscreen
> >> and the moment of passing over the downrange skyscreen.
> >> This means syncing the 10 MHz clocks at both ends together.
> >> I guess the crux of my question to the time-nuts gang
> >> is what is the easiest (cheapest!!) way to do this.
> >> For a number of years I have been using an ultrasonic
> >> shot-group size measurement system made by Oehler
> >> Research. It can resolve individual shot placement
> >> to within 1 cm. Some less expensive systems that
> >> use fewer sensors can only resolve to +/- 2 cm. The
> >> Oehler Research system also determines time of flight.
> >> The problem is that these systems all use a cable
> >> to connect back to the equipment at the shooting bench.
> >> I am trying to find a way to synchronize/coordinate
> >> a downrange 10 MHz clock to the "master" 10 MHz system
> >> clock at the shooting bench without spending hundreds
> >> of $$ doing it. It is not too big a problem to process
> >> all of the signals from the downrange skyscreens and the
> >> ultrasonic shot-group sensors and telemeter the results
> >> back to the shooting bench.
> >> However, time-of-flight info (via an RF link requires
> >> that I sync the 10MHz clocks at both ends together.
> >> Use of GPS receivers seems to be the most likely way
> >> to do this but how do I keep the cost and complexity
> >> down?
> >> Thanks in advance for any feedback on the matter!
> >> Mike Baker
> >> ---------------------
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> >> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >> and follow the instructions there.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 360.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 453 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts_lists.febo.com/attachments/20101101/b9841d60/attachment.gif>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list