[time-nuts] 10811 foam enclosure
Chris Albertson
albertson.chris at gmail.com
Sun Jan 9 19:58:27 UTC 2011
When I was working with a group that was buillding astronomical
cameras using CCD chips we wanted to keep the CCD chip at a very
constant temperature that was much lower than ambient. This is
actually a harder problem then building a crystal oven but still not
out of amateur's range. We ued a Peltier device, aka
"thermoelectric". These act like two why heat pumps and can either
cool or heat the CCD depending on what way the current flows. The
Pelier, had a large heat sink on one side and a block of aluminum on
the other. The CCD was cemented to the large aluminim block. Also
holles were drilled and thermisters embedded in the block. A
computer read the thermister temperatue and controlled current tothe
Pelier via a 16-bit DAC. The entrire assemble was inside a thick
wall aluminum can and we pumpped the can down to a rough vacuum
because vacuum is a good insulator. Others might fill the can with
argon a few times as it is a better insulator than air. Sounds
complex but not really, only about a half dozen parts., unless you
count the heatsink. We used water cooling. My system uased a 60
galon aquarium tank as a stable resivor for the water, others used
large trash cans. OK long story but we could keep the CCD inside a
0.01C range. The trick is (1) to find some one who understands
servo control loops and (2) use a large enough aluminum block and keep
is insulated from the environment. Vacuum insulation works well
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:07 AM, <EWKehren at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Being a Shera Fan I finally broke down and bought a Tbolt. I experimented
> with a foam enclosure with roughly 1 centimeter on all sides. What I found
> that it only increased the board temperature by 19 C. It was still as
> sensitive to ambient. Thanks to Lady Heater it even shows an increase of 40 mC
> when I walk up to it with one minute delay.. Changing to an aluminum
> extrusion the increase is only 7 C and the response is much slower. In its final
> assembly it will be inside a larger metal mass, I do not think that the
> higher temperature of 56 C is conducive to longer life. Opinion: putting foam
> around a 10811 will only give you a warm feeling unless you make it much
> larger than shown in the picture of of KH6GRT.
> Based on the above test results I feel mass is more important. So I took a
> aluminum enclosed dewar weighing 943 gr. and did first put a resistor in it
> and heated it up with 2 W. Temp. did rise to 70 C. Next I disassembled my
> worse 10811, which is very easy, since it is a nice compact unit and
> inserted it in the dewar. Monitoring temp with my YSI it shows 65.2 C with 24 C
> ambient. Power dissipation is 1.575 W. Will track it over time before I
> replace the 10811 with one of my better ones for frequency tests.
> Questions to our experts:
> A) will Removing the foam mess with the temp. control loop
> B) How low can total power into the 10811 be before temp control can become
> a problem, I think I am ok now, but once in a chassis with Shera and
> power and battery the temp. surrounding the dewar may become a problem.
> C) What is the preferred orientation of the unit.
>
> I asked already once before if any one has data on the 1 1 PPS output of
> the Tbolt over time, since I am considering it as an alternative to a stand
> alone GPS receiver, and if there are GPS receivers that outperform a Tbolt
> what is the recommendation. It will be used to control a Rb.
> Bert Kehren
>
>
> In a message dated 1/7/2011 8:22:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> tvb at LeapSecond.com writes:
>
> Has anyone experimented with the amount of insulation on a
> 10544 or 10811 oscillator? They are meant to run hot by
> design and I worry that adding any insulation, or too much
> insulation, will either cause over-heating or limit the ability
> of the oven control to maintain the set point.
>
> None of the hp/Agilent bench test equipment that uses these
> oscillators uses insulation. Perhaps that's a clue.
>
> /tvb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
=====
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list