[time-nuts] Result of Earth Quake speeds up earth?
cook michael
michael.cook at sfr.fr
Sun Mar 20 09:28:55 UTC 2011
Le 20/03/2011 05:59, Bruce Griffiths a écrit :
>
> jimlux wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A 10-12m diameter dish is probably close to the minimum feasible
>>> aperture.
>>> A 4m dish can be made to work in conjunction with a mauch larger dish
>>> (eg 30m).
>>>
>>
>> The original speculation was for measuring the small change in earth
>> rotation rate, for which some sort of interferometric measurement of
>> a stellar source could be used.
I sincerely doubt that it will be possible to get undisputed
verification of this speed up as the magnitude is swamped by the
irregular diurnal and sub-diurnal rotation rates induced by tidal
effects that are at lease a magnitude greater and for which the error
bars are of the same order or grater than the predicted shift.
There was a similarly predicted rotation shift predicted for the Chile
quake of 28 February 2010 (1,26us). There was IIRC no verification of
that AFAIK. Check the tidal effects at
http://bowie.gsfc.nasa.gov/ggfc/tides/intro.html for the tidal effect
and
http://hpiers.obspm.fr/ for rotational measured speed changes
http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/index.php?index=news for the statement
of detectability.
>>
>> The source has to be bright (so you can detect it with a practical
>> antenna.. not everyone has a 30m dish in their back yard)
>> The source has to be small angle (or at least something that you
>> could accurately determine the centroid of)
>> The source has to be "not moving" (which I think leaves out using
>> something like jupiter)
>> The frequency of measurement has to be somewhere that the atmosphere
>> won't dominate the uncertainty (leaving out optical, I think)
>>
>>
>> SO what's the brightest small angular radio source out there?
>
> 3C273
>
> RA 12:29.1 DEC 02:03.1
>
>>
>>
>> As someone else has pointed out, measuring the earth surface position
>> relative to spacecraft orbits, e.g. GPS, would be another technique.
>> In fact, a high resolution measurement of the position of a geosync
>> sat might do.. If the earth's rotation rate changes you'd have to
>> adjust the height of the satellites in Clarke orbit to keep them
>> stationary.
>>
>> Unfortunately, for earth orbiters, there's enough other perturbations
>> that you probably can't see it. They already have to move satellites
>> around to compensate for things like solar wind, air drag (for LEO),
>> etc.
>>
>> But maybe for a spacecraft in deep space, between planets, which is
>> on a well understood trajectory?
>>
>>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list