[time-nuts] Rubidium (Rb) or Caesium (Cs)
Jim Lux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Wed Oct 19 00:13:48 UTC 2011
On 10/18/11 3:32 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
> ** Choke ring, ground plane -- this has been covered before.
> Along with temperature stabilized antenna, cables, and/or
> receiver, it's an inexpensive way to gain some performance.
> I don't have numbers but it seems at the point people use
> dual-frequency and carrier-phase receivers they start to
> pay this level of attention to the antenna.
My GPS buddies here at JPL say that there's a whole raft of effects that
one needs to start taking into account when you get to 1 meter/3ns kinds
of precision. Apparently, for a variety of practical reasons, things are
built so that no one error source dominates in a particular accuracy
class. (e.g. if you're figuring out how to find the nearest In-n-Out
Burger, you probably don't need a choke ring antenna). Solid earth
tides, ionosphere, etc.,etc.etc.
>
> ** Post-processing -- there is a penalty for knowing what
> time you think it is right now vs. knowing what time it really
> was an hour or day ago. Most high-end navigation/timing
> systems separate data collection from precise results. If
> over time you can combine the results of tens of hundreds
> of other labs everyone can benefit from greater accuracy.
> When you get below a nanosecond, precise orbits and
> signal propagation are very complicated and variable.
GIPSY is offered to all comers, for free. All you need is the ability
to generate RINEX format files.
http://apps.gdgps.net/
http://www.gdgps.net/
You can do (I understand, not having tried it) things like post process
your data to compensate for ionospheric effects (measured by others)
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list