[time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 96, Issue 70
Chris Hoffman, KG6O
cq.kg6o at gmail.com
Tue Jul 17 15:15:36 UTC 2012
Wow! Great info.
The 5v mag mount antennae are working, but the receivers are cycling between 2-D and 3-D (5 or 6-bird) modes. With the 26dB trimbles, I suspect I'm loosing ~5db in the 30ft of crumby RG-5, and a little pattern with my rain-gutter backplane.
I don't have too much arial obstruction, but that's no excuse from overkill: I'll be on the lookout for 26- or 40[?!?]-dB cones.
Does anyone have a Lucent part number available?
-CH
On Jul 17, 2012, at 5:00, time-nuts-request at febo.com wrote:
> Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
> time-nuts at febo.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> time-nuts-request at febo.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> time-nuts-owner at febo.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of time-nuts digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: XL-DC Antenna Requirements (Tom Knox)
> 2. Re: XL-DC Antenna Requirements (Bob Martin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:11:59 -0600
> From: Tom Knox <actast at hotmail.com>
> To: Time-Nuts <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC Antenna Requirements
> Message-ID: <BAY162-W4046E629AF83F1D3BDED81DFDB0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Hi Chris;
> There were a number of XL-DC produced with 12vdc antenna power and should be marked near the connector. There are also some marked "Down converter required". Other then then those the 58532A is a great choice andf sold under a number of names such as VIC-100, the Lucent antennas are also nice. The lucent are available in three gains 20, 26, 40 dB version. Most are the 26dB version and are a great product. Placement can be important, and although you could use indoors it will perform best as low as possible with a full view of the sky. (Low to avoid terrestrial interference).
>
> Thomas Knox
>
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:50:02 +0200
>> From: azelio.boriani at screen.it
>> To: time-nuts at febo.com
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC Antenna Requirements
>>
>> The XL-DC is a 6 channels receiver, so no other benefit other than a
>> greater probability to see constantly 6 satellites is gained from 24 to 32
>> satellites constellation.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Chris Hoffman <cq.kg6o at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Though somewhat outmoded, looking forward to starting my own time shop
>>> with two XL-DC controllers that I have been lucky enough to pick up
>>> recently.
>>>
>>> My question: Do I really need to invest in the likes of the HP 58532A
>>> antennae, or will my surplus Trimble magnetic antennae -- magnetically
>>> attached to a random ferrous backplane -- do?
>>>
>>> I guess what I am really asking: what are the relevant antenna design
>>> requirements here, and does the advent of as 32-satellite-constellation
>>> have any effect upon the antenna choice (i.e. design downgrade) for the
>>> TrueTime XL-DC?
>>>
>>> -CH
>>>
>>> Chris Hoffman
>>> cq.kg6o at gmail.com
>>> http://ar.ctur.us
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -CH
>>>
>>> Chris Hoffman
>>> cq.kg6o at gmail.com
>>> http://ar.ctur.us
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:02:49 -0700
> From: Bob Martin <k6rtm at comcast.net>
> To: time-nuts at febo.com
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC Antenna Requirements
> Message-ID: <8DBEF16D-CE19-4088-9347-458C02A53360 at comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Chris--
>
> The 58532A is somewhat higher gain (30dBi or better) than most mag-mount antennas (26dBi typ IIRC). The pointy nature of the 58532A also serves as an avian deterrent, reducing the accumulation of attenuating deposits...
>
> Running two receivers, I would highly recommend a real GPS distribution amp such as the 58535A. Such a beast will let you run both receivers from one antenna, while providing isolation between the receivers. I just happen to have one handy, having recently pulled it out of service and replaced it with a 4-port model to better support my time-nuttiness. Contact me off list if you would be interested.
>
> 73 Bob k6rtm at arrl.net
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2012, at 16:01, time-nuts-request at febo.com wrote:
>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:59:52 -0700
>> From: Chris Hoffman <cq.kg6o at gmail.com>
>> To: time-nuts at febo.com
>> Subject: [time-nuts] XL-DC Antenna Requirements
>> Message-ID: <0208B173-9F7B-49B9-AE83-EE231EBBA18E at gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Though somewhat outmoded, looking forward to starting my own time shop with two XL-DC controllers that I have been lucky enough to pick up recently.
>>
>> My question: Do I really need to invest in the likes of the HP 58532A antennae, or will my surplus Trimble magnetic antennae -- magnetically attached to a random ferrous backplane -- do?
>>
>> I guess what I am really asking: what are the relevant antenna design requirements here, and does the advent of as 32-satellite-constellation have any effect upon the antenna choice (i.e. design downgrade) for the TrueTime XL-DC?
>>
>> -CH
>>
>> Chris Hoffman
>> cq.kg6o at gmail.com
>> http://ar.ctur.us
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list
> time-nuts at febo.com
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
> End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 96, Issue 70
> *****************************************
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list