[time-nuts] Speaking of Costas loops
Dennis Ferguson
dennis.c.ferguson at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 23:55:22 UTC 2013
On 5 Jul, 2013, at 08:33 , Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:
> The sat needs to transmit at the GPS frequencies and have an uplink that works exclusively with those frequencies. (or at least that sub band). A "normal" transponder probably would not radiate at the GPS allocation, simply to be a good citizen. I believe the "specialization" is simply a frequency mod to allow WAAS to pass through. There is no mention of a space qualified Cs and / or Rb flying on those birds and no indication that the ground segment is controlling such a payload. If all that *was* present, then including them in the normal navigation solutions would be a "zero cost" next step.
Addressing the last sentence I found a government WAAS reference
which indicates that the WAAS satellites are indeed interchangeable
with GPS satellites in navigation solutions. It is is on page 7 of
this
http://www.gps.gov/technical/ps/2008-WAAS-performance-standard.pdf
where it says
The WAAS GEO broadcast also provides an additional ranging source
for improved availability of navigation services. When a WAAS receiver
is using the corrections and integrity messages broadcast by the GEO,
only four GPS or GEO satellites are needed, which increases the
availability of service versus RAIM or RAIM/FDE.
While what is or isn't required in the satellite to support this is
still a mystery it seems like the timing accuracy coming back must
end up being equivalent to a real GPS satellite. What this is good
for is interesting to think about.
Dennis Ferguson
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list