[time-nuts] sine to square wave converter
EWKehren at aol.com
EWKehren at aol.com
Thu Jul 10 19:51:41 UTC 2014
Will the added stage negatively effect ADEV?
Bert
In a message dated 7/10/2014 3:48:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org writes:
Bert,
OK, good that you are familiar with it, it was not obvious in that message.
If you consider it as the first stage, and that you then can put another
(faster) stage after it until you go for comparator. It's just the same
thing as the multistage for beat-note, but you run at a higher
frequency. That way you should increase your slew-rate step-wise.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 07/10/2014 09:37 PM, EWKehren at aol.com wrote:
> Magnus
> Thank you for your recommendation I use Wenzel extensively as a matter of
> fact I just completed in the last three days two boards that have Wenzel
on
> it and in my projects I can count 14 boards. Rise and fall time is my
> concern but I am open to suggestions that is why I turned to the list
looking
> for the best.
> Thanks again Bert Kehren
>
>
> In a message dated 7/10/2014 3:09:52 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org writes:
>
> Bert,
>
> On 07/10/2014 04:55 PM, EWKehren at aol.com wrote:
>> As part of the FE 405 B project a separate output circuit is in the
> works.
>> The universal controller and auxiliary board are the same as used in
the
>> FE5680A GPSDO but because of the very low ADEV a separate circuit
board
> that
>> divides by three and has also two ground isolated transformer outputs
> is in
>> the works.The question is what is the best sine to square wave
converter
>> with the lowest ADEV contribution. I am looking at Bruce's circuit
> using the
>> ADCMP600. Any other ideas?
>
> Do look at the Wenzel clockshaper [1], look at the TADD-2 [2] schematic.
> It's a PNP long-tail pair. The strategy is to provide modest gain. A
> known strategy to reduce 1/f noise and to some degree thermal
> differences is naturally feedback, as you will find in the NIST papers.
> Once you have the slew-rate up, going in for the kill with a straight
> comparator should give you all the nice output slew-rate you can wish
for.
>
> Thus, this is not all that different to the mixer-setup you have done.
>
> I have modified my TADD-2 such that one of the output channels is fed
> from the input circuit, and this provides me with a squared up version.
> For a counter such as DTS-2070C, the difference is significant, which
> helps to show the potential of this simple design.
>
> I think the basic approach can be improved, and how far one has to go
> depends on how "clean" source you have. You end up with interesting
> measurement problems.
>
> An indirect way to measure the goodness of a squarer is to insert some
> known sine disturbance at say 30 or 40 dB below the signal. A straight
> comparator won't work very well. Be careful with selectivity of LC, as
> it is a nice way to become temperature dependent, so low-Q solutions is
> needed.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
> [1] http://www.wenzel.com/documents/waveform.html
> [2] https://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-2.html
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to ht
> tps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list