[time-nuts] Why using HP5370 ext-ref is (maybe) a bad idea
GandalfG8 at aol.com
GandalfG8 at aol.com
Mon Mar 3 14:23:37 UTC 2014
Sorry, I must have missunderstood.
I realise the internal reference is already a 10811, but I thought there
was some concern that just the use of the external reference facility might
be in some way responsible, so if that was the case then perhaps using an
external 10811 might also be expected to cause the same problem?.
If it did then that would potentially rules out any issues with the 3336.
Regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
In a message dated 03/03/2014 14:12:38 GMT Standard Time,
phk at phk.freebsd.dk writes:
In message <834d5.64e2b237.4045e6d6 at aol.com>, GandalfG8 at aol.com writes:
>What about replacing the 3336 external reference with something like an
HP
>10811 and checking what difference, if any, that makes?
The internal reference is an 10811 already ?
The point is not what delivers the reference, but if it is synchronized
to the input signals being measured.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list