[time-nuts] SMD TADD-1 distribution amplifier - seeking comments and suggestions?

Bob Camp kb8tq at n1k.org
Tue Dec 22 12:49:42 UTC 2015


Hi

To be very specific about the floor on the gates (as measured with a TimePod):

1) Clean 5.5V supply (max the part can rationally take).
2) Input signal L network transformed to just below the protection diode threshold (roughly 6V p-p)
3) Input signal to the power splitter is from an OCXO so it’s pretty clean and does not have a lot of “junk” on it.
4) Output is Tee network matched off of a pair of gates in parallel 
5) Power supply is clean, but nothing special (LT1764). 

I believe there are plots in the archives. 

Bob


> On Dec 21, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> Do those modern CMOS gates use deuterated wafers?I've not found any measurements of the PN of modern CMOS gates.The measurements of devices like the venerable 74AC04 indicate a PN floor around 10dBc/Hz worse than that.
> Bruce
> 
> 
>    On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 3:00 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> To go through the whole deal a step at a time *assuming* that broadband noise is the only issue:
> 
> -147 dbm noise per Hz
> +10 dbm signal
> 
> => -157 dbc / Hz
> 
> half to AM, half to PM
> 
> => -160 dbc / Hz
> 
> ssb is already taken care of (noise on both sides if it’s broadband)
> 
> => -160 dbc / Hz 
> 
> Now, assuming you have a modulation on the edge due to low frequency noise:
> 
> -147 dbm noise per Hz
> +10 dbm signal 
> +0 conversion gain (might be less, rarely is more)
> 
> => -157 dbc / Hz
> 
> It all may go to PM so
> 
> => -157 dbc / Hz
> 
> It’s DSB (sidebands are coherent) modulation so 
> 
> => -151 dbc / Hz
> 
> You could easily say that all of the stuff after the conversion gain number is just messing around. 
> That would indeed be correct. All that has been done is to calculate a conversion gain for low 
> frequency noise to PM as read by a phase noise test set. The main point is to illustrate that you 
> may be *more* sensitive to low frequency noise than you might think. 
> 
> =====
> 
> Biased CMOS gates are looking better and better … -175 dbc / Hz floor with a 7 dbm input …. :)
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 21, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Anders Wallin <anders.e.e.wallin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> AD8055 in non-inverting circuit with 1+2k7/2k7 gain has 9.6 nV/sqrt(Hz)
>>>> input-referred voltage noise PSD (if I calculated correctly..)
>>> 
>>> With +10dBm input the corresponding SSB PN floor should be  around
>>> -163dBc/Hz.
>>> 
>> 
>> HI,
>> How is that calculated? I only get this far:
>> 9.6nV/sqrt(Hz) into a 50R load is 1.8e-18 W/Hz or -147.3 dBm/Hz
>> 
>> what then? split half-and-half into AM and PN, and how to relate that to
>> the carrier power +10dBm?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Anders
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.




More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list