[time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

Didier Juges shalimr9 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 10:20:12 UTC 2015


I have a page that illustrates how you can use a delay line and a mixer to separately obtain AM and PM

http://www.ko4bb.com/Timing/Phase_Detector

Didier KO4BB


On January 14, 2015 1:19:11 PM CST, Mike Feher <mfeher at eozinc.com> wrote:
>At those low levels, how does one differentiate between phase or AM
>noise? Thanks & Regards - Mike 
>
>Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
>89 Arnold Blvd.
>Howell, NJ, 07731
>732-886-5960 office
>908-902-3831 cell
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Bruce
>Griffiths
>Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:22 AM
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the
>definition of the second
>
>Although the phase noise when using optical combs to generate Rf
>signals is low there is no mention of the am noise.
>
>Bruce
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>and follow the instructions there.

-- 
Sent from my Motorola Droid Razr HD 4G LTE wireless tracker while I do other things.


More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list