[time-nuts] Venus838LPx-T opinions?
Charles Steinmetz
csteinmetz at yandex.com
Sat Jul 23 06:40:21 UTC 2016
Mark wrote:
> Oh, and besides the lack of a binary message with satellite position/signal levels, there is none that reports the sawtooth error.
How in the world can they call it a "timing receiver" if it doesn't even
support sawtooth correction?? Good grief.
Also, I see they claim 6nS accuracy. That is pretty much exactly 1/2
cycle of the main clock frequency, so +/- 6nS should be the expected
theoretical best possible error envelope WRT the quantization error,
*assuming the receiver's timing solution is always perfect.* Are we
supposed to believe they achieve that accuracy in practice, despite all
of the well-known sources of error in GPS timing solutions??
Best regards,
Charles
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list