[time-nuts] question about multi-way measurement
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Thu Dec 27 07:26:56 UTC 2018
--------
In message <20181226234228.B84F240605C at ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>, Hal Murray writes:
>
>tvb at LeapSecond.com said:
>> But most people have only one counter (one internal or external timebase
>> reference) and one clock to be measured. So the measurements are one-to-one.
>> If you have more references or more clocks, you're welcome to combine 2, or
>> 3, or as many as you want. It gets complicated but in some cases this
>> complexity is justified.
>
>Lots of people have several PCs, each with their own clock. If you have your
>time-nut hat on, they are crappy clocks with lots of common mode errors
>(temperature, network delays). I think the techniques should apply.
They do. But in my experience all you end up getting is a very precise
measurement of the air-conditions performance.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list