[time-nuts] HP Stories: Battery Chargers, and a fading idolization of HP
Luca
iw2lje at gmail.com
Sun Feb 10 12:55:21 UTC 2019
Thanks Hugh for the story, and thanks for the schematic!
Quite interesting.
There is a little strangeness: the wave clipper darlington transistor Q1 is
marked as 1854-0611, equivalent to the standard darlington 2N6055. But why
there is a simple 2N3055 in the picture? Some sort of version update fail?
Thanks
Cheers
Luca
iw2lje
Il giorno sabato 9 febbraio 2019, Rice, Hugh (IPH Writing Systems) <
hugh.rice at hp.com> ha scritto:
> I grew up on Silicon Valley (Santa Clara Valley, California), graduating
> from High School in 1980. My home town is Cupertino, also the home of
> Apple Computer. During my formative teen years in the 1970s, HP was THE
> company in the valley, the elder statesmen of Hi-Tech. (Apple was just a
> small upstart business for computer geeks, and their headquarters were just
> down Bubb Road from my HS.) The reputation of HP as a great company was
> untouchable. Both in the quality of the products, and as a the best place
> to work. Being from Silicon Valley, I choose to study electrical
> engineering (rather than my natural inclination towards mechanical
> engineering, having done a lot of work on cars and bicycles), hoping to
> come back to the area to work when I graduated. I had fantasies of
> working for HP in my college summers as a “SEED” student, but was never
> able to make the right connections. A HP job upon graduation with a BSEE
> was like winning the lottery, especially for a Silicon Valley Kid.
>
> Home for Christmas during my senior year, I was visiting a friend from
> church, and her dad (Charles Adams) asked me how my job search was going,
> and if I had considered working for HP. “I’d LOVE to work for HP. I just
> can’t crack in and get an interview.” He said they had an opening for a
> new grad EE, and asked if I would be interested in considering it. “Uh,
> yes!” A few days later, I was in the Precision Frequency Sources
> Production Engineering area, doing the all day rounds of a classic HP
> interview. I did well enough that they offered me a job the next day, and
> I went back to school for my final semester with a HP job in hand. A
> certifiable miracle. It didn’t get any better than this.
>
> I asked Charles what I could do to prepare for the job, and he mailed me a
> 5061A Operating and Service Manual to review. It was incomprehensible.
> But I could tell that the 5061A was something pretty special, because all
> the circuit diagrams and theory of operation descriptions had things in
> them that even the grad students I knew couldn’t understand. And I had a
> job at HP! Working on Atomic Clocks! (Whatever they were.)
>
> As you know from past postings, my job was part of the 5061A to 5061B
> development team. The first task I was assigned to was to freshen up A2
> Battery Charger Assembly. The purpose of this circuit was to keep the 20
> cell NiCad backup battery ready to supply power in emergencies. The must
> fix issue was a gigantic mica capacitor used in a RC timing circuit, which
> was both expensive and unprocurable. I think my mentor, Roberto,
> encouraged me to look over the whole circuit, and sift out all the other
> old parts that would a problem in the near future. (All that code 4 part
> stuff.)
>
> So I studied the circuit like only a new grad can do. Brand new
> engineers are nearly worthless, and no one has any reason to talk to them
> or distract them. This was before the internet, cell phones, email (at my
> location), and any other distraction. I had hours and hours of
> uninterrupted time. The circuit was strikingly complex for a battery
> charger. But you have to remember by frame of reference. HP was the
> best electrical engineering company in the world. Their products were
> awesome. Surely every circuit in every product was the result of deep
> expertise from brilliant engineers, and every resistor, capacitor and
> transistor had a sacred purpose. So I kept digging until I understood
> every aspect of the circuit.
>
> The “brilliant” designer had decided that the battery charger needed to be
> a two-level system. A fast charge to replenish the battery quickly after
> a power failure, and then a lower “trickle” charge to keep it topped off
> long term. But how long to do the fast charge? Well, if we time the
> discharge time, we can then use that to set the fast charge time. Battery
> power for 20 minutes? Fast charge 20 minutes at a similar rate. In
> addition, the charger assembly had a drop-out relay circuit, so if the
> battery voltage got too low, the relay would trip to disconnect the battery
> protect it from over discharge. (Oh yes, the relay used was also
> impossible to procure, being some ridiculous double pole, double throw,
> part unique to the 5061A). Add another circuit to flash the front panel
> light when the back-up battery was supplying power. And then the charge
> current regulator itself, which of course was a transistor level fully
> discrete design with dozens of components.
>
> But it gets better: The discharge, recharge timing circuit used the most
> complex counter IC available from the TI TTL catalog. A pre-settable,
> programable, up-down counter. There may have been two counters, for 8
> bits of resolution. To make it better, the counters were pre-set to a
> specific but obscure number, that had them exactly count down to zero
> after about 90 minutes, when using the timing rate set by the RC circuit
> with the aforementioned giant unprocurable Mica capacitor.
>
> I wish I could find a circuit diagram of the 5061A, to fully relive the
> experience and share it with you all.
>
> OK, now that I finally had the circuit figured out, what do I do? I
> think Roberto recommended that I read the “GE Battery Book”, since GE was
> the supplier of the Ni-CAD battery pack, to give me background on
> rechargeable batteries. I bought a new copy, and read the whole thing
> cover to cover in a couple of days. All kinds of information on charging
> at the “C” rate (a 1Amp Hour battery “C” factor is 1 Amp) for fast
> charging, and 0.1C for trickle charging (full charge in 10 hours), and how
> trickle charging is best for the batteries, and so forth.
>
> As I’m reading the GE book, I’m slowing realizing that the 5061A battery
> charger is pretty complicated, for what appears to be a fairly simple
> task. As I chat with Roberto more about it, it becomes clear that the
> circuit is perhaps a bit over complicated. But wait, aren’t HP engineers
> the best in the world, and every circuit they design the best possible
> implementation known to man? The idolization I had developed from my
> Silicon Valley roots, and all the praise from my university professors and
> peers is starting to loose its luster. This battery charger wasn’t a
> great design. I wasn’t even a good design. It was a ridiculously
> complicated, expensive, idiotic design that never should have made it
> through any sensible design review. I never did learn who did the work.
> I don’t think they worked at Santa Clara Division any more. Probably a
> good thing.
>
> This was actually a blessing in disguise. Only a few months into my HP
> career I learned the priceless lesson that inherited work isn’t always good
> work. I also learned to really understand the task that needed to be done,
> before you set out to do it. Like learn how batteries work before
> designing chargers. And then I had the opportunity to design a completely
> new circuit from scratch.
>
> I had a new goal: Make a good, simple, reliable battery charger, but it
> had to be backwards compatible to the 5061A. HP didn’t want to support
> the old design any more (huge mica capacitors and crazy relays), and the
> new circuit needed to be a replacement assembly too. This presented
> another priceless lesson: real work design is often constrained, and not
> clean sheet like those university projects.
>
> I’m still proud of the final battery charger design. So proud that
> attached the 5061B circuit diagram if you want to be impressed. 😊 I
> ditched the timing circuits altogether, and just went a simple trickle
> charger. If a 5061B application has a power outage of 30+ minutes, how
> likely are they going to have another long power outage within the next few
> hours? Not very. The new circuit used standard, inexpensive, robust
> components in the whole design. There are other clever (to me) aspects,
> and you can discover them on your own if you are interested.
>
> One last story on this. My first prototype of the circuit was hand
> soldered together on proto-board material. That generic PCB with grids of
> 0.10” pitch holes all over it. Roberto told me to go to the 5061A
> production line tech’s, and have them try out the new circuit. Picture a
> brand new engineer who looks about 17 years old, with this rats nest of a
> proto circuit for them to test. I recall one of the Tech’s, Ray, putting
> on safety glasses before he put it in a test 5061A and powered it up. They
> never wore safety glasses. I don’t think it worked on the first try.
> But I recall that the problem was something simple to resolve.
>
> Over the next few years, HPs iconic reputation would continue to loose
> it’s luster in my eyes, as I learned that mortal people worked there, and
> that real business had real problems. But there were also a lot of
> really good engineers and technicians there, and they would help you if you
> asked.
>
> It was a fantastic start to a 35 year (and counting) career at HP.
>
> Happy Chinese New Year from Singapore,
>
> Hugh Rice
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list