[time-nuts] A simple sampling DMTD

Jan-Derk Bakker jdbakker at gmail.com
Sun Sep 1 00:09:19 UTC 2019


Dear all,

I've been working on a design for a (relatively) simple, standalone
sampling DMTD. Very rough preliminary schematics can be found at
http://www.lartmaker.nl/time-nuts/DMTD_rev0.99.pdf .

Design goals are:
- ps-level accuracy
- comparison of frequencies between at least 10 and 50MHz, preferably
between 1 and 100MHz
- comparison of (selected) different frequencies (in my case: 10MHz vs
50MHz)
- standalone operation, field-portable
- option for raw data sampling / (post)processing on a PC
- option for generating a tuning voltage to lock the measured oscillator to
the reference, so the DMTD can act as a PLL in phase noise test setups

Context: you may remember that a year or two ago I posted to time-nuts
about a GPSDO-design geared for mobile applications, which I was working on
for an SDR-platform my students are working with. This SDR-platform has now
grown to include a 100-channel phased array receiver. To validate the
reference clock distribution in this array (amongst other things) I would
like to have a DMTD. As the commercial offerings are outside the budget of
our lab, I was planning to roll my own.

The core of the system is a transformer-coupled LTC2140-14 dual 14-bit ADC,
sampling at an offset frequency of nominally 10MHz+10Hz generated by a
VCTCXO (with an option for an OCXO). The ADC was chosen for its large input
bandwidth and small aperture jitter. Simulations of a simple software ZCD
consisting of a digital filter and least-squares fitting showed that
100ksps would be more than enough to get the desired accuracy. As the ADC
design is unable to achieve sample rates lower than 1MSPS, D-flipflops are
used to decimate the samples. These DFFs are also used to multiplex the
2x14-bit samples to an 8-bit data bus going into one of the GPIO-ports of
an XMega. The XMega runs the ZCD, and generates a tuning voltage for the
offset oscillator. Communication to a logging PC is done with a
galvanically isolated FT2232H, which has both an ASCII COM-port for the ZCD
data and a control interface and an asynchronous FIFO to transfer raw
samples. System power comes from the isolated USB bus or a barrel jack; BOM
cost in qty10+ is around 100US$.

(The DMTD has a few more power rails than I would have liked. Originally I
had planned to use the LTC2295 and have a 3v3-only system, but after
re-reading the NIST paper on SDR-as-a-DMTD I concluded that the single
clocking path of the 2140 would likely have better aperture jitter
correlation between the channels. As a 1.8V/10MHz XMega would only be
borderline able to handle the computations, I ended up with this design.
LVC logic is used to go from 3.3V->1.8V, LV1T translators for the opposite
direction.)

Design decisions and/or non-goals:
- I considered putting a small FPGA (specifically a Lattice ice40
UltraPlus) between the ADC and the processor. This was rejected because the
performance of the decimator appeared to be sufficient, and I wasn't
certain that I could get DDR mode + a CORDIC working in this FPGA.
- Especially when I found the necessity to move part of the system to 1.8V
I considered moving to an ARM. I stuck with the XMega as performance was
sufficient, and I am very familiar with both the CPU and the peripherals
(particularly time-stamping counters and the Event system) that would ease
the ZCD implementation and issues like synchronization between processor
and sampling system.
- I looked into integrating a phase noise measurement, but could find no
easy way that wouldn't degrade DMTD operation in the process. The tuning
voltage output is an inexpensive compromise (as I still had a DAC and
enough cycles to spare)
- The main thing I'm unsure about is the effect of the balun on phase
performance wrt temperature and termination matching. I've kept to the
baluns as they add less noise than a fully differential amplifier would.

While I've made this design for my own purposes, I would be more than happy
to put it under an Open Hardware-license and/or work with TAPR or other
parties to get it distributed, should there be interest.

Thoughts?

with kind regards,

Jan-Derk Bakker
[planning to start board layout tomorrow; looks like this should definitely
fit on a 100x160mm Eurocard inside a Hammond 1455-series box]



More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list