[time-nuts] eLORAN will be on the air GRI 99600

[Forrest Christian (List Account)]

I probably need to clarify where I'm coming from in relation to my previous
message.

I have a fair bit of background in dealing with using GPS clock sources for
synchronization at communication sites.   Many of these sites are lucky to
have a rubidium oscillator in place for holdover, although some do (usually
the larger ones).  And we're talking about thousands and thousands and
thousands of these sites.

Where I was coming from is that at these sites, GPS can be a challenge -
it's in a narrow band, very low signal, and, at least from my worldview, it
seems like GPS interference is becoming more prevalent instead of less.
 As a result, whether terrestrial or via satellite, it would be nice to
have a second alternative in a different band where one could obtain a
reasonably aligned 1PPS (+-1uSish).

I'm hopeful that eLORAN will result in this result.   I'm also curious
about the GPS L5 signal once it becomes operational since that is far
enough away frequency wise that one would hope that it wouldn't be affected
by the same interference source.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:19 PM jimlux <jimlux at earthlink.net> wrote:

> On 8/6/20 4:28 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
> > If you look at generally-available GNSS PNT solutions, you'll find a few
> > failure modes:
> >
> > 1) Loss of a satellite (or two).   This is why the constellations have
> more
> > satellites than is strictly necessary, so not a big deal.
> >
> > 2) Loss of control/failure in the control system/constellation wide
> > software failure, aka the recent Galileo failure.   This is why you have
> > multiple GNSS constellations.
> >
> > 3) Ground based interference (jamming, spoofing), etc.    This is why you
> > need a terrestrial backup, which doesn't really exist.
> >
> > For timing, I wouldn't be opposed to someone flying (or adding a payload
> > to) a couple of geostationary satellites which live in a separate band
> from
> > GNSS.  It would be interesting to be able to put up a small satellite
> dish
> > and get a highly reliable and hard to interfere with timing alternative
> to
> > GNSS.    I know there are two way time transfer options out there, I'm
> more
> > thinking basically a fixed-location cesium clock in the sky.
> >
>
> Well, the GPS folks found that a Rb works better than a Cs, and both
> need ground monitoring and updating.
>
> One could rent a Single Channel Per Carrier transponder slot on a GEO
> satellite, feed a carrier derived from your ensemble of clocks to the
> uplink, and there you go.
>
> My google-fu is failing and I can't find even a rough cost for such a
> service.  Maybe something like $50k/month? $600k/year.
>
> That 600k would probably buy you *one* space qualified Rb oscillator of
> "good enough" performance, maybe.   USOs like used on GRAIL were
> $1M/each sort of items in qty 4. And then you need some TWTAs to amplify
> the signals for transmission - those are also pretty pricey.
>
> And then the launch cost.. I happen to know (because I just bought it at
> work) that you can push about 100-120kg to a GEO+1000km orbit for right
> around $10M.  Rocketlabs might do 20-30kg to a similar orbit for half that.
>
>
> All in all, I suspect that there are better uses of the $50M it would
> cost - You could buy a LOT of Cesium clocks for terrestrial use.
>
> If you're willing to do CSAC level performance, and you're willing to
> have it be in LEO, so you see it a couple times a day for 20 minutes,
> and you're willing to do some design and fab in your garage - under $5M.
>
> Look up CHOMPTT  - CSAC and optical links.
>
>
> https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4407&context=smallsat
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>


-- 
- Forrest