[time-nuts] SMPS or conventional?
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Thu Oct 22 12:36:59 UTC 2020
Hi
The magnetic field sensitivity is dependent on a lot of things.
Strangely enough, the higher the C field, the more sensitive
the physics package is ( yes, that’s weird …). All Rb’s incorporate
shielding to reduce the external field impact. Since the shielding
is rarely perfect, there are asymmetries in the response.
All that turns this into a “field from here at level X” matters on this
Rb and not on that one sort of thing.
=======
The “easy” way to get a feel for what’s what is to rotate the device
in the horizontal plane. The earth’s mag field (unless you are close
to the magnetic poles) will change in a predictable manner. If you see
a measurable frequency change … you have an answer.
The more complicated approach uses Helmholtz coils. It’s more complicated
mainly because they take time to fab …..
Both approaches are only approximate unless you go a bit crazy on
a bunch of minor details.
Bob
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 6:17 AM, Angus via time-nuts <time-nuts at lists.febo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The magnetic field issue has bothered me a little too, but I don't
> know whether it has a practical effect. Maybe putting a fan in a
> plastic or aluminium box close to the Rb might show something - unless
> someone already knows the effects.
>
> I have a compass on the bench beside the LPRO, and it does drift a
> bit. What surprised me most was how much the field around the mains
> transformers changed each time they are switched on or off.
>
> Angus.
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:04:11 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The only issue with the controlled fan approach is that you
>> have a variable magnetic field as a result. That and the vibration
>> both can impact the stability of the Rb. Some means of isolating
>> the fan from the immediate vicinity of the Rb sounds like a good idea.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:31 AM, Luiz Alberto Saba <las at intercat.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am thinking in an black aluminium finned heatsink, the size of the base plate, and a fan, controlled by an electronic thermostat (sensor direct coupled to the heatsink). Is that ok?
>>>
>>> Em 21/10/2020 09:40, Wannes Sels escreveu:
>>>> There are conflicting requirements regarding temperature in Rb's:
>>>>
>>>> - For best performance, the rubidium and quartz oscillators must be kept at
>>>> a high and stable temperature.
>>>> - For reliability, the supporting electronics must be kept at a lower
>>>> temperature.
>>>>
>>>> The heater takes care of the high temperature. The stability of the
>>>> temperature can be improved by increasing the thermal mass, i.e. adding a
>>>> block of aluminium or copper.
>>>> The electronics can be kept cooler with a heatsink, and forced ventilation
>>>> if needed.
>>>>
>>>> When you stick both the electronics and physics in a small package, this
>>>> becomes more difficult. For the PRS-10 some form of heatsink is pretty much
>>>> required to keep the electronics cool enough. Although I seem to remember
>>>> reading somewhere that the "benchtop" heatsink they offer now is lighter
>>>> than older units.
>>>>
>>>> If the room temperature is not stable enough, you might want to increase
>>>> the size of the heatsink and add a fan. This reduces the temperature swing
>>>> inside the unit, while still cooling the electronics, at the cost of
>>>> increased power draw for the heater.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:38 AM Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I spent a lot of years buying Rbs and putting them on small heatsinks.
>>>>> I
>>>>>> always was disappointed in their reliability. That continued to be the
>>>>> case
>>>>>> up to the point that the baseplate temps got into the 40C region. In my
>>>>>> case, that took a fan
> .
>>>>> How well did it work if the heat sink wasn't small? What is your version
>>>>> of
>>>>> small?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any data (or vague memories) of how much it helps to orient
>>>>> the
>>>>> heat sink so the fins are vertical so they encourage warm air to flow up
>>>>> past
>>>>> the fins?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to
>>>>> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list