[time-nuts] OCXO housings - Why copper and not iron/steel?

[Luiz Alberto Saba]

My bad... copper is the second, losing only to silver, as a thermal conductor.

Enviado do meu iPhone

> Em 30 de out. de 2020, à(s) 19:06, Luiz Alberto Saba <las at intercat.com.br> escreveu:
> 
> If my memory serves me, copper has the better conductivity of all the periodic table...
> 
> Enviado do meu iPhone
> 
>> Em 30 de out. de 2020, à(s) 18:56, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> escreveu:
>> 
>> Moin,
>> 
>> I have been looking at heat capacities of different materials
>> lately. One thing that struk me odd is, that the volumetric
>> heat capacity of copper, which is the thing that most people
>> use when building something that needs to have high heat capacity
>> to get stable temperature, has only a volumetric heat capacity
>> of 3.45 J/(cm^3·K). Meanwhile, the much cheaper iron has
>> a volumetric heat capacity of 3.53 J/(cm^3·K) and steel 
>> even 3.75 J/(cm^3·K).
>> 
>> In an OCXO, which is generally size limited, getting the most
>> heat capacity in the limited volume would be the main goal,
>> wouldn't it? Also optimizing for price would be a major thing.
>> I can understand that iron is probably not the right choice
>> due to its tendency to oxidize. But using a soft (annealed) steel
>> would be easy to machine, cheaper per piece and give almost 10%
>> higher heat capacity in the same volume. 
>> 
>> So why do people choose copper instead of steel?
>> 
>> 
>>           Attila Kinali
>> 
>> PS: Fun fact: Water has a volumetric heat capacity of 4.18 J/(cm^3·K)
>> at 25°C. We should fill OCXOs with water! :-D
>> 
>> -- 
>> <JaberWorky>    The bad part of Zurich is where the degenerates
>>               throw DARK chocolate at you.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>> and follow the instructions there.