[time-nuts] Re: Query about List and about 10 MHz Distro
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Sun Aug 29 00:26:56 UTC 2021
Hi
Anything you do that has a bunch of 10 MHz cables running out from here or there
will impact your ability to listen to WWV at 10 MHz :) Other than killing all the sources,
there is no silver bullet.
Bob
> On Aug 28, 2021, at 7:57 PM, Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoober at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bob, my own motivation for going to fiber was entirely different. I
> simply wanted to
> run 10 MHz all over the place from reference sources in disparate
> locations in the
> house, and I quickly discovered that cable leakage was embarrassingly
> severe. So
> I shut down and began contemplating a fiber link. But then reality set in
> and I realized
> that running fiber across the house had its own big problems, so I set the
> project aside.
>
> Dana
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 3:32 PM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> With a whole variety of pretty good OCXOâs going for cheap money
>> on eBay, itâs likely less expensive to do cleanup oscillators on the link
>> compared to going crazy with low noise optical this or that. Yes, you
>> will be getting something in the high 150âs for noise, but still pretty
>> good
>> for $10.
>>
>> If you need better, spend $50 or so on a 10811. Still less money than
>> some of the crazy fiber stuff.
>>
>> With either one, send over a high enough frequency that the loop isnât
>> dealing with reference spurs in any significant way. Given the clock rates
>> Ethernet runs at these days, that part should be fairly straightforward.
>>
>> This *assumes* that there is a crossover somewhere practical between
>> the fiber noise and the noise on the optical gear. You should be able to
>> work out what it is with some fairly normal phase noise or ADEV testing.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Aug 28, 2021, at 3:03 PM, Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoober at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was looking for something similar about 18 months or so ago. Although
>> I
>>> haven't taken any
>>> action yet, I concluded that one could do a nice job for under $200 per
>>> segment, including the
>>> transmitter and receiver modules and lots of connectorized multimode
>>> fiber. What I *don't* know
>>> is what the phase noise performance would be, except that I do know that
>>> the fiber's VF *is*
>>> materially influenced by temperature.
>>>
>>> I was looking primarily at the HFBR-2416 for the fiber receiver, and the
>>> HFBR-1412 (standard
>>> power) or the HFBR-1414 (high power option) for the transmitter Unlike
>>> most of the available
>>> models, these are fundamentally analog devices, meaning that you can
>>> transmit sinewave
>>> 10 MHz through them. At the time I was looking, Mouser was selling these
>>> for about $20 each.
>>>
>>> See the datasheet at
>>>
>> https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/678/AV02-0176EN_2019-02-15-1827546.pdf
>>> with particular attention to page 21 regarding the HFBR-2416 receiver.
>>>
>>> I was also looking at Fiber Instrument Sales for patch cords. We bought
>> a
>>> lot of fiber stuff from
>>> them at Arecibo, and I was always happy with them. See:
>>>
>> https://www.fiberinstrumentsales.com/catalog-cable-assemblies?gclid=Cj0KCQjwvaeJBhCvARIsABgTDM7eNTkP2nQbyFzhcwDE38VnSEP879MBKV1ZyDq2YrnEtOn7_VfzjbkaAtpfEALw_wcB
>>>
>>> Somebody had pointed out yet another source of connectorized fibers
>> ("patch
>>> cords") to me, but I cannot find the name
>>> at the moment.
>>>
>>> Dana K8YUM
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:52 AM AC0XU (Jim) <James.Schatzman at ac0xu.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am hoping that you can help me about a couple of things:
>>>>
>>>> 1) My time-nuts summaries sometimes appear unformatted and unreadable.
>> All
>>>> the text from all the postings is crammed together without spacing. How
>> can
>>>> I fix it?
>>>>
>>>> 2) I want to distribute 10 MHz references by fiber. There are
>>>> RF-over-Fiber products available, but too expensive for me (thousands of
>>>> $$$ per xmit/rcv set). I am thinking that it should be possible to use
>>>> fiber Ethernet components to do this. I don't mean IEEE 1588 but a much
>>>> simpler, no-computer-required, solution. Possibly just converting sine
>> wave
>>>> (coax) to square wave (fiber) to sine wave (coax). I am looking for a
>> low
>>>> cost solution. Any thoughts or recommendations??
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
>> send
>>>> an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
>> send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list