[time-nuts] Re: Low declination satellites...

Magnus Danielson magnus at rubidium.se
Thu Jul 8 08:26:04 UTC 2021


Hi Ulf,

Interesting! Curiously enough it's my Leica antennas that has spheric
radomes.

I should try to get one of them up, but the current antenna up will have
to suffice until then.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2021-07-08 09:49, Ulf Kylenfall via time-nuts wrote:
> What we found at the Onsala Space Observatory, was that satellites
> in low declination added some error due to atmospheric tindering.
> What was also discovered was that conical radomes on the Leica
> antennas also was not optimum. Therefore, spheric radomes was substituded
> and the antennas was selected to minimize coverage for low declination
> satellites.
> Cheers
> Ulf Kylenfall SM6GXV
> Senior Research Engineer (Retired)ex Onsala Space Observatory
>
>   
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.




More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list