[time-nuts] Re: DIY Low offset Phase Noise Analyzer (Erik Kaashoek)
Magnus Danielson
magnus at rubidium.se
Fri Jul 8 01:19:19 UTC 2022
Hi,
A well established method is to use a separate offset RF generator that
you can steer frequency to form suitable offset and amplitude to form
known level. You can now inject this ontop of a signal to measure.
Consider that you steer your offset frequency to be +1 kHz of the
carrier you measure, and you set the amplitude to be -57 dB from the
carrier. This now becomes equivalent to having a -60 dBc phase
modulation at 1 kHz.
The RF generator does not have to be ultra-clean in phase noise just
reasonably steerable in frequency and amplitude.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 2022-07-07 12:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:
> Bob, others.
> It has been explained that for the best phase noise level calibration
> on should use a signal with one radian phase modulation and measure
> the output voltage.
> The problem with this approach is the unknown gain of the path into
> the PC. And due to the gain one can not modulate with one radian as
> this saturates the whole path.
> An alternative method for phase noise level calibration could be to
> create an oscillator so bad its phase noise can be measured using a
> spectrum analyzer. To make such a bad oscillator a 10MHz signal was
> phase modulated with noise. The phase noise became visible on the
> spectrum analyzer just above 20 degrees of modulation. The phase noise
> level saturated between 55 and 60 degrees which is consistent with one
> radian (57 degrees). The spectrum analyzer could measure the phase
> noise at a flat -80dbc/Hz ( yes Bob, I better use the right dimensions)
> The simple phase noise analyzer also measured the phase noise at
> -80dBc providing evidence the level calibration was done correctly.
> I also tried to increase the DUT drive into the mixer further above
> saturation so see if this made any change in the measured level but
> once above 0dBm I did not observe any change up to +10dBm drive. Any
> higher levels felt too dangerous.
> There is still a lot of work to be done to further increase accuracy.
> Erik.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list