[time-nuts] Re: Counter internal resolution error
Demetrios Matsakis
dnmyiasou at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 17 23:03:39 UTC 2023
On fact one of our best engineers concluded that there was leakage
across the inputs, as Magnus mentioned. I thought at the time he had
measured it, but I am not 100% sure of that.
On Mar 17, 2023, at 13:47, Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.se>
wrote:

I also recall one paper relating to laser ranging measurement of the
moon which also looked at temperature dependence of counters, and
SR620 showed more sensitivity than some other counters. For some
measurement purposes, the impact is less than for others.
A fun experiment would be to use a delay-stepper to plot this. I
accumulated equipment for that over the years, with increasing
resolution and performance but never got around to it. Good little
practical experiment now that I was able to steer the Colby DL10
programmable trombone delay.
There is two common reasons for non-linearity, one is from the
interpolator itself where error-pulse shaper as well as
pulse-to-voltage converter has non-linearities. Another one is du to
leakage of either clock or other input shifts the trigger point due
to lacking isolation. Such non-linearities can be handled through
measurement setup and at times with averaging.
Some properties can be managed through wise use of the
autocalibration.
Then again, most of the times I do not bother to go the extra
stretch, but it is good to know the effects are there so one can
consider them and if needed cope with them.
So, time to close down computer, check out and leave Vancouver after
a WSTS conference.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 2023-03-17 16:57, Demetrios Matsakis wrote:
I donât know how SR counters are today, but when we were upgrading
our infrastructure over a decade ago we found other counters had
better linearity. Rover et alâs open source article has a good
discussion of these issues, although of course you need to have one
if you are going to experiment. See G. D. Rovera, M. Siccardi, S.
Romisch, and M. Abgrali, âTime delay measurements: estimation of the
error budgetâ, Metrologia 56, 2019 035004
On Mar 17, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts
[1]<time-nuts at lists.febo.com> wrote:
Dear Michael,
On 2023-03-16 08:17, Michael Wouters via time-nuts wrote:
Dear time-nuts
Counter specs often include an âinternal resolutionâ error. For
example,
the SR620 specs say that it is 25 ps in single-shot, but this can be
reduced to 4 ps with sufficient, repeated measurements. Can anyone
offer
any enlightenment as to the origin of this error, and the
statistical
distribution it has? I mentioned the SR620 but information about the
53230A
would be interesting too.
First of all, the single-shot resolution is somewhat of a hallmark
measure when it comes to counters.
The interpolator resolution is part of this, but consider that there
exists non-linearities in the interpolator which makes the error
larger. I recall there being a plot of the non-linearity in the SR620
manual.
It is not uncommon to have interpolator resolution better than
non-linearities, but the later may be more subtle to most.
Averaging can help, but depending to specifics, it's hard to give a
number.
Cheers,
Magnus
Cheers
Michael
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [2]time-nuts at lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to [3]time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [4]time-nuts at lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to [5]time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
References
1. mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com
2. mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com
3. mailto:time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
4. mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com
5. mailto:time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list