[time-nuts] Re: SDR radios - Loran-C & WWV
Scott Newell
newell+timenuts at n5tnl.com
Wed Mar 13 00:44:37 UTC 2024
At 09:57 PM 3/6/2024, John Ackermann N8UR via time-nuts wrote:
>WWV tracking (and CHU as well) is a major experiment in the HamSci
>(https://hamsci.org) community, where they've built low-cost
>hardware to monitor multiple WWV frequencies
>simultaneously. There's a major effort lined up to get data from
>hundreds of stations during the eclipse on April 8.
Do you happen to know if it's too late to get in on this? And if
totality is required? (My QTH will only be 99.997%, but work will be
in totality for 3:44. Steel building and no easy window access for an
antenna, though.)
>There's an ~$250 device called the RX888 that's available on eBay
>and Amazon that does this (no link because there are multiple
>providers and I can't vouch for any of them). And Phil Karn has
>developed a completely new client/server based radio that uses
>multicast to allow many clients receiving hundreds of channels to
>connect to one receiver server. Check out ka9q-radio at
>https://github.com/ka9q/ka9q-radio
(Sorry to pile on with the questions...) This looks very exciting,
but I'm concerned I might not have any PCs fast enough. Everything
I've read just mentioned recent i5/i7, which is suitably vague. Any
idea if there are benchmarks for guidance as to should work/might
work/won't work?
Looking through the e-waste piles, I see the following:
CPU Geekbench 4 5 6
(single/multicore score)
i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz 4802/16033 1073/3967 1377/4374
i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz 4238/12841 910/3187
Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz 4079/14979 901/3750 765/2822
Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz 4257/14133 913/3550 773/2707
Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz 2618/12433 541/3243 524/2317
i7-2920XM CPU @ 2.50GHz 3734/11556 792/2926 670/2207
i7-5500U CPU @ 2.40GHz 3929/7399 837/1781 1096/2123
i5-4200U CPU @ 1.60GHz 3368/5944 701/1423 914/1781
i3-5005U CPU @ 2.00GHz 2687/5176 538/1222 709/1495
Atom x6425E @ 2.00GHz 2753/6585 687/1673 548/1272
Atom E3950 @ 1.60GHz 1426/4401 311/1129 264/835
How to know if any would be suitable?
Thanks!
--
newell N5TNL
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list