[volt-nuts] Traveling Standards
Bob Smither
smither at c-c-i.com
Wed May 9 18:53:05 UTC 2012
On 05/08/2012 12:52 PM, Charles Black wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> What a great job you are doing by organizing this cooperative field
> comparison! It sounds like a lot of work though!
> Looking at the first lab photo brought back memories of where I started
> with my new (to me) 3458A three years ago! I hope it is OK to offer
> suggestions that will make measuring microvolt levels on a 3458A more
> accurate . Similar techniques can be used on any meter though.
> I have been periodically monitoring my Datron 4910 and 4912 10V
> standards for about 3 years looking at measurement drifts mainly
> caused by temperature. I have many hours of recorded data looking at
> 0.1 PPM resolution drifts in my system. In order to improve data
> stability I had to change my measuring technique from a BNC cable with
> dual banana adapters (what is shown in the photo) to twisted pair
> copper wires or shielded twisted pair wires (22 or 24 gauge) to
> minimize input thermal offsets and settling time. Tin plating on the
> wires measures about the same offset voltage as copper so it hasn't
> been a problem to use it so far. If I put a huge thermal mass on my
> input terminals (plastic dual banana plug) it can take many minutes to
> stabilize and even then air currents will keep my meter from
> stabilizing as completely as it can. Today my meter has about -240nv
> offset voltage from a copper wire short but I see -1.2 microvolt with a
> shorted dual banana plug, even a gold plated one. I have a shielded
> dual banana to BNC adapter that's even worse.
> My 3458A is very temperature sensitive so I constantly monitor the
> temperature right in front of the input jacks to 0.1 degree C. I try to
> keep mine at 23 degrees and do frequent ACAL's and repeat the ACAL if
> more the terminal temperature varies much over a degree from 23C. The
> TEMP? is also very important to watch and could be used to predict
> temperature offset error. The TEMP? creeps up over a few months due to
> dust in the filter but it is easy to clean with a little tap water.
> The 3458A has a variable resolution feature that can be a problem at
> high resolutions. Full DC resolution is acheived at NPLC = 1000. Lower
> NPLC levels can be used to speed up measurements if loss of accuracy is
> not a concern.
> My shop has distinct thermal stratification so I try to keep the test
> unit I am measuring at the same height as the meter and close to the
> meter when doing accurate work.
> As far as the portable standard goes - it would be great if it had gold
> plated dual banana spaced terminal posts similar to the 3458A posts for
> best repeatability and flexibility but, of course, any jacks will work
> if they have enough time to stabilize.
> Charlie
Thanks Charlie - great suggestions.
My goal has always been to know the values from the two references in the TS to
with 10 ppm. For the two refs (nominal 7 Volt and 5 Volt) this is 70uV and 50 uV.
I have one meter here that I can easily see thermal effects on (an old Fluke
845AR - 1uV full scale on most sensitive setting) so I appreciate your notes
about the use of copper wires.
Even though only trying for 10 ppm I appreciate that any source of error that
can be eliminated needs to be considered.
With your permission I would like to add your notes to the page here:
http://c-c-i.com/ts
so I refer folks that are taking measurements on the TS to them.
Best regards,
--
=========================================================================
Bob Smither bob at smither.net
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of
fighting a foreign enemy.
-James Madison
=========================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smither.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 140 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.febo.com/pipermail/volt-nuts/attachments/20120509/ba84452e/attachment.vcf>
More information about the volt-nuts
mailing list