[volt-nuts] fluke 332d

[pa4tim at gmail.com]

 I have a 332 that was unused on a shelf for 25-30 years. Together with a Guildline 4 cell standard, a 720, 845 and a ESI KV divider. (and more)  I use the guildline and 720 to set the 332.,Then set a  731 as a control to check during calibration if one is changed. My 332 seems to be not bad but not as a pure Volt standard. If set it at 10V through the methode above, it aqlways needs to be set some where between 10.000,000 and 10,000.050. I power it up en set it around 12 hours before calibration and check it just before I need it. The dift the varies around +/- 4 uV.


When I brought the 332 back to live I reformed and tested all caps. Replaced some and had to replace one power transistor. Afther that I calibrated it against de standard cells. My 731 is not great.


For me as amateur calibrator/voltnut more then good enough.


Fred






Verzonden met Windows Mail





Van: Frank Stellmach
Verzonden: ‎dinsdag‎ ‎11‎ ‎maart‎ ‎2014 ‎11‎:‎15
Aan: volt-nuts





Hi,
first my opinion about the Fluke 332/335:
Those are very nice instruments, and you really need such instruments, 
if you really want to calibrate your DCV gear: Only having a 10V 
reference as 732A/B, or all those amateur grade 2.5 / 5 / 10V references 
won't help, as you always need the Cardinal Points (1000V, 100V, 10V, 
1V, 100mV) for calibration.

Therefore, those old 332/335 calibrators are basic instruments, to 
generate those voltage in first instance.
You have to make sure, that they already contain the MOSFET chopper card 
(not the mechanical chopper).
The reference also comes in two variants, either the older zener diode 
oven, or the Reference Amplifier version.
Both are ok, but will not give more stability than about 10ppm/ 2months.
There is an elaborate teardown/ripoff of the 332B/AF on EEEVBlog, where 
you can see additional stability parameters I have measured.
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/fluke-332baf-in-the-slaughterhouse/msg393609/#msg393609

 From those measurements, I really doubt, that old 332/335 calibrators 
will really get better over time.
The reference is too simple to be principally stable, that begins with 
the simple oven, and ends by the non buried zener RefAmp. The 
cummulative drift over 40 years was about 500pm, so you cannot really 
state, that its stability had improved over time.
The noise of the instrument presumably increased over time, as all the 
capacitors deteriorate, and also all the transistors loose their gain hfe.
As simply a precision, stable  high voltage power supply,  a working 
332D is very fine.
The stability level is several ppm in any aspect.

But as a standard, there's one important further problem:
The 332D itself needs calibration, first linearity, second the range 
calibration.
That strictly requires additional equipment, as a Fluke 720A, or a 
HP3458A, and a Fluke 752A.
I have designed my own 100:1 / 10:1 Hammon divider, see EEVBLOG also, 
and for example, the 34401A is also capable to adjust the linearity.

At least, I recommend to buy a Fluke 5440/5442.

Its stabilities are ten times better in all aspects, and it features 
ultra high linearity by design,(my device: ~0.1ppm), and a Autocal 
feature, like the 3458A.
The additional 1V and 100mV ranges have to be calibrated externally 
again, but 10V, 100V and 1kV can be calibrated from one external 10V 
source, similar to the 3458A.

Frank
_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.