AW: [time-nuts] HP 10811A vs 10811-60111

Hubert v. Bonhorst hvonbonhorst at t-online.de
Sat Apr 23 15:13:50 UTC 2005


Sorry for page flipped. Attached pdf is for 10811-60111
Best regards
Hubert
DB7ME

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] Im
Auftrag von David Kirkby
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. April 2005 16:32
An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Betreff: [time-nuts] HP 10811A vs 10811-60111

Can anyone tell me the difference between the two above oscillators? I 
have the manual for the 97page manual (page 2 is upside down), but it 
does not mention the latter.

However, I think I have seen a small couple of page document somewhere 
which listed the 10811-60111 as having no specification for phase noise, 
and so therefore not an ideal choice for a low phase noise oscillator. 
One might as well start with something that is specified for a low phase 
noise.

I can't however now find the exact spec of the 10811-60111. Can anyone 
give me it?

I won an auction for a 10811A on eBay and the seller said I could have a 
10811-60111 for the same price if I wanted it too. I said no, I wanted 
the 10811A, but he has sent me the  10811-60111 instead.

Is the 10811-60111 inferior? How does it differ from the 10811A?

-- 
Dr. David Kirkby,
G8WRB

Please check out http://www.g8wrb.org/
of if you live in Essex http://www.southminster-branch-line.org.uk/



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Seiten aus HP10811-Specs.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 9005 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts_lists.febo.com/attachments/20050423/61283615/attachment.pdf>


More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list