[time-nuts] Austron 2000C
Shaun Merrigan
smerriga at compusmart.ab.ca
Fri Aug 12 14:30:18 UTC 2005
Regarding the Austron 2000C setup:
I just finished going through the chart recorder method of
determining the tracking point, and it turns out that I was
correct in my visual determination using the oscilloscope and
sweep rates of 5 and 10 us/division. However, it is much
easier to see the first cycle of the pulse on the chart
paper than on the 'scope screen. I can see that with higher
background noise, the chart recorder would be better. Presumably
I could replace the paper chart recorder with a DAQ/PC
arrangement as well.
Shaun Merrigan
-------------
smerriga at compus....
53.6044N, 113.4517W
ACME LABS Materials Engineering
"Without Materials, Nothing." -SPM
Altair 8080B, the genesis of an Industry...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com]On
> Behalf Of Shaun Merrigan
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 19:40
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: [time-nuts] Austron 2000C
>
>
>
>
> I have not (yet) used a chart recorder to determine the
> optimum position of the tracking pulse, relying instead on
> my 'scope and my eye.
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list