[time-nuts] Z3816a and newbie questions
Brian Kirby
kirbybq at bellsouth.net
Sun Jan 9 23:43:27 UTC 2005
I beleive that HP made some errors when writing the Z3801A manual, or
they were unclear/grey about some areas. The spec of 1E10-9 would be
the oscillator unlocked, probally worse case, temp drift, etc. The
basic oscillator is better than this - If you look at the 10811A/B
quartz crystal oscillator manual, long term drift at 24 hours is rated
less than 5E-10. ! second variance is 5E10-12. Now if we look at
Mejia-Norton's file "Performance Specifications for HP 10811D/E Family
Crystal Oscillators and at the 10811-60158 (page 21) specs are coarse
tuning +/- 5x10E-7, EFC +/-2E10-7 for a range of +/- 5Volts. Long term
stability 2.5E-10 per 24 hours after warm up and typical 1E10-8 for the
year.
When the Z3801A is locked up, it approaches UTC, parts in low 10E-13 to
slightly better over 24 hours.
Rex wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:28:00 +0100, Alberto di Bene <dibene at usa.net>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>> Rex wrote:
>>
>>I downloaded the "Z3801A GPS Receiver User's Guide" from Symmetricon. It
>>has Specifications in section 5. It gives "10 MHz Output
>>Characteristics" as "Frequency Accuracy: < 1 x 10^-9, one day average".
>>
>>
>> Doesn't that number take into account also the possibility of an
>> holdover?
>> 73 Alberto I2PHD
>>
>>
>
>Possibly. The manual I quoted from doesn't say more, other than phase
>noise numbers.
>
>I would think that the 10811 should do better than 1 x 10^-9 even
>without adjusting for drift in holdover. This strange documentation is
>one reason I asked my original question.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list