[time-nuts] LPRO-101 with Brooks Shera's GPS locking circuit
Dr Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Thu Dec 14 01:52:28 UTC 2006
Jack Hudler wrote:
> If I'm totally missing something here please correct and enlighten me.
>
> On the subject of Brooks Shera's design, the one thing that troubles me is the
> use of a 24 MHz oscillator to count the width of the 1PPS signal.
> This yields a precision of 4.16e-8, but does it really?
> This oscillator is uncontrolled and any drift would exist as noise that would
> have to be filtered (He uses a software low pass filter).
>
> Question: Why not multiply the VCXO or OCXO output by 5 or 10 and run that into
> 24 or 32 bit counter? OR just sample the counter on every 10th PPS?
>
> Thank,
> Jack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf
> Of Richard H McCorkle
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:44 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LPRO-101 with Brooks Shera's GPS locking circuit
>
> Hi Brendan,
> I would contact Brooks Shera directly before you go any further as the span
> of his controller is set at 4.5e-8 and the maximum span on an LPRO is about
> 5e-9. He can reprogram the controller by changing the filter gain and loop
> time so it is about 8X more sensitive so it will work with a direct
> connection to the LPRO. I have a controller modified with the filter gain is
> scaled up 1 step and the loop time set to 120 seconds and this works well
> with an LPRO attached directly to the DAC.
> Enjoy!
> Richard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brendan Minish" <ei6iz.brendan at gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:13 AM
> Subject: [time-nuts] LPRO-101 with Brooks Shera's GPS locking circuit
>
>
>
>> Hi I am looking for info on using the Brooks Shera GPS-VCXO Controller
>> with an EFRATOM LPRO-101?
>>
>> I currently have it locking an old and unknown single oven Xtal
>> oscillator this is working as well but I hope to replace this with the
>> LPRO-101
>>
>> Has anyone any suggestions as to how best to choose the correct values
>> of R5 and R6 for use with the LPRO-101 C field control input.
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Brendan EI6IZ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list
>> time-nuts at febo.com
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list
> time-nuts at febo.com
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list
> time-nuts at febo.com
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>
The Brooks Shera circuit relies on the 24 MHz oscillator not being
locked to the OCXO or the PPS signal so that (in the absence of
injection locking) averaging the measured time interval gives an
unbiased estimate of the true value. Using a higher speed oscillator to
measure the time interval would be advantageous with the more accurate
GPS timing receivers currently available. If you have an M12+ or MTM
timing receiver and a rubidium oscillator the Brooks Shera technique is
not optimum you can easily achieve a performance that is 1-2 orders of
magnitude better with a less complex phase detector. The Brooks Shera
circuit has a single shot resolution of 41.6 nanosec which may be up to
10 times worse than the jitter in the PPS output of a good timing
receiver (after correcting for any sawtooth error - in software of
course, to avoid any additional noise and errors caused by hardware
correction).
The phase detector method employed is the digital equivalent of a
classical sampling phase detector with a linear phase detection
characteristic. A phase lock loop employing a sampling phase detector
will lock to a harmonic of the sampling frequency, which in this case is
1Hz. It is therefore necessary to divide down the OCXO (or other high
stability oscillator) frequency to a value such that the efc tuning
range of the oscillator precludes locking to the undesired harmonic.
Unfortunately a phase detector with a linear characteristic can
sometimes allow the phase lock loop to lock to a frequency which is not
a harmonic of the sampling frequency (in this case frequencies like
17/13, 12/11 Hz etc.).
A phase detector with a sinusoidal characteristic (such as an ADC
sampling a sinewave produced by filtering the output of a counter
clocked by the OCXO) avoids the problem of non harmonic locking and
eliminates most of the digital circuitry.
A loop time constant of around 120 seconds is far too short for
obtaining the optimum performance from a good rubidium standard, as the
loop will degrade the rubidium standard to an accuracy of around 35E-10
(with a 41.6ns single shot measurement resolution) when a good rubidium
standard is capable of a considerably higher stability than this.
Bruce
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list