[time-nuts] Short-Term Stability
Mike Feher
mfeher at eozinc.com
Thu Mar 16 17:17:05 UTC 2006
Poul -
OK, I glanced through the paper. Similar concept to what we used to do with
adding analog noise prior to quantization to improve overall dynamic range.
I do not understand however what this has to do with reducing spurious in a
DDS. Are you saying that you need an extra bit in the wave shaping ROM that
goes to the MSBs of the accumulator and then feeds the D/A? That of course
would mean an additional bit in the D/A as well, and that is where the
problem is. If you could have an extra bit in the D/A then you would
theoretically pick up 6 dB improvement in spurious anyway. - Mike
Mike B. Feher
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Short-Term Stability
In message <006601c64919$75bfc530$0201a8c0 at n4fs>, "Mike Feher" writes:
>Poul -
>
>Unfortunately the technology does not yet allow having a 69 tap FIR running
>data at a 2 GHz clock rate.
You don't need that.
All you need is an extra bit in your wave-shape memory.
Read the paper, please.
> http://hjem.get2net.dk/jjn/quantfir.htm
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list