[time-nuts] Tried the SigNav TM3-02 yet?

[Randy Warner]

Richard,

As a matter of fact we have been working with various prototypes for
about 6 months. The 1PPS is very stable (<10ns without sawtooth). We
have actually been working with the TM3-01 which supports both NMEA and
12 channel Moto binary. At the recent ION conference it was announced
that we will be distributing the TM3 receivers in the Americas.

The M12M receiver will remain as our main focus even while we start
distributing the TM3. The main reason we are adding SigNav products is
that they are fully RoHS compliant.

If anyone has any "commercial" questions please contact me off line.

Randy
  

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Richard H McCorkle
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 6:04 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] Tried the SigNav TM3-02 yet?

Has anyone on the list had an opportunity to work with the SigNav
TM3-02 GPS receiver (http://www.signav.com.au/index_files/PDF_Files/
New_Brochures/SigNav%20TM3-02%20Brochure%20V1.2.pdf)
and test the stability of their "sawtooth eliminated" 1PPS output? 
I am curious how the 1PPS stability compares to the iLotus M12M with
sawtooth correction for precision timing applications.
Thanks.
Richard
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts