[time-nuts] Looking for Wavecrest Visi
Dr Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Wed Apr 11 19:44:45 EDT 2007
Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> I used a 100k sample average which yields (IIRC) 200 femtosecond
>> resolution in the 5370B, and for each run checked the min, max, and
>> standard deviation statistics to make sure nothing goofy was going on
>> Standard deviation for a run like that on my 5370B is typically 30 to 40ps.
> 30-40 ps seems OK to me. But are you saying then that you
> get a measured value to 200 fs resolution but with +/- 30 ps
> standard deviation? This doesn't feel right at all. It seems to me
> if your sdev is +/- 30 ps it is incorrect to even write down the
> measured values to ps levels; and fs are out of the question.
> time-nuts mailing list
> time-nuts at febo.com
I assume the standard deviation is that of the population of 100K
measurements and not the standard deviation of their mean, which should
be around 95-126 fs.
Averaging of course does nothing to reduce systematic errors which can
be as high as 100ps in a 5370A/B. However for cable matching purposes
systematic errors largely cancel out.
More information about the time-nuts