[time-nuts] Fury Realhamradio listing
Dr Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Sun Apr 29 01:20:03 EDT 2007
SAIDJACK at aol.com wrote:
> They can get 0.1ns resolution on the printout because of averaging. I don't
> know what their native granularity is.
> Single shot resolution may not have such a significant impact since the GPS
> used in the Z3801A is so much worse than the M12+.
> Our resolution is more coarse than 100ps, but our inherent GPS noise is very
> significantly lower than the Z3801. Resolution of 100ps with a peak to peak
> noise of 100ns or more is not as good as peak to peak noise of 31ns with RMS
> noise of <10ns.
> So even if they have true 100ps hardware resolution (I somehow doubt it
> since an expensive 54132A only has 150ps resolution) then that's more than two
> orders of magnitude less than their sawtooth noise - does it really matter at
> that point?
Obtaining 100ps resolution, particularly when one is only making 1
measurement per second, is relatively easy and inexpensive to do with a
few discrete components.
Obtaining much better than 150ps resolution is somewhat more difficult
when using the technique employed by the HP53131/2 in its CMOS gate array.
More information about the time-nuts