[time-nuts] Dang, I fixed ANOTHER one! [OT]

[Bruce Lane]

Hi, Javier,

	I'm blocking much of the 80.x ranges, but that's one that I can safely punch holes in. What are the addresses for your servers?

	Group folk: Please bear with us. We'll take it to E-mail as soon as we get the communication issues sorted.

	Thanks.

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 19-Jan-07 at 09:01 Javier wrote:

>Hi, Bruce... It was not about time/frequency standards, but about a 
>DSA602  :-). However... do you have also blocked the 80.0.0.0/8 range? 
>(because my two outgoing servers were blocked...). Both are from static 
>IPs and clean in SORBS :-).
>
>Sorry again to the group for the noise.
>
>Regards,
>
>Javier, EA1CRB
>
>Bruce Lane wrote:
>
>>Hi, Javier,
>>
>>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>>
>>On 18-Jan-07 at 09:26 Javier wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>Off Topic - Sorry for the noise
>>>
>>>Hello, Bruce,
>>>
>>>I'm trying to send you an e-mail but get it bounced... Could you unblock 
>>>my address jherrero at hvsistemas.es? Thanks!
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>	Uhhh... actually, it's not your specific address that's getting blocked,
>but the entire 200.0.0.0/8 subnet.
>>
>>	The reason is simple: I've seen nearly as much spam and network abuse
>come from systems scattered all over that subnet as I have from China's
>221/8. For that reason, I've chosen to refuse all traffic from 200/8 until
>the ISPs realize that the Internet is not theirs to allow their spammers
>to pollute.
>>
>>	In other words: I can't easily punch a hole for you without opening our
>network to further risk of spam and other abuse.
>>
>>	Now, with that said: I think I know why you were trying to contact me
>because I saw your post where you were looking for a time/frequency
>standard. If that was it, I'm sorry, but I'm really not interested in
>selling this particular unit. First off, it has several frequency outputs
>that are useful to me. Even if that were not the case, it has some pretty
>amazing history behind it, in terms of having been involved in fields of
>interest to me, so I would prefer to keep it around.
>>
>>	Please continue your search, though. I'm sure you will find a decent
>unit eventually.
>>
>>	Happy hunting.
>>
>>
>>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
>>Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
>>kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
>>"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with
>surreal ports?"
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>time-nuts mailing list
>>time-nuts at febo.com
>>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"