[time-nuts] New Trimble timing products
Dr Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Mon May 21 22:44:08 EDT 2007
Didier Juges wrote:
> Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>> Didier Juges wrote:
>>> Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma.
>>> Didier KO4BB
>> Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical?
>> Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify that the timing error
>> is stochastic.
> Not knowing how it is measured and the nature of the noise, I realized I
> had *assumed* rms and 1 sigma to be the same, but in fact I was not sure.
> The data sheet does say "at 1 sigma", so I wanted to be accurate and not
> make assumptions, this is time-nuts after all :-)
> Let's be honest, if I had not corrected myself, you would probably have
> commented, and rightfully so, that the data sheet actually said "at 1
> sigma" :-)
> I am trying to learn, I am just a little slow...
Oops, if however the error has a non zero mean then the rms and 1 sigma
values are not identical.
Such a systematic offset can arise from antenna, receiver and cable delay
More information about the time-nuts