[time-nuts] Fury Interface Board: 5MHz needed?
Magnus Danielson
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Sun Nov 4 15:45:59 UTC 2007
From: xaos <xaos at darksmile.net>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fury Interface Board: 5MHz needed?
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:24:59 -0500
Message-ID: <472DE44B.7050407 at darksmile.net>
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: time-nuts-bounces+magnus=rubidium.dyndns.org at febo.com RETRY
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Shall we consider 5MHz OCXO's?
>
> I have a BUNCH of those. Most are really low end devices but I also have
> a few gems.
> I mean, some people might have a really nice 5MHz OCXO. Why exclude
> them, if we don't have to?
>
> Anyone out there with interest in this?
>
> If nobody, except me, wants this I'll just drop it.
>
> Bruce suggested that a NIST JFET frequency doubler might do the trick.
It is a very good and simpel solution.
> What does the math say?
>
> If the frequency is multiplied by two, what else is multiplied?
> Frequency error? I would think so.
The normalized frequency error does not change, just the relative error.
Remember, you divide with the nominal frequency.
> What about phase noise?
Doubles from the source and some addition. However, you normally have a very
stable and good oscillator at 5 MHz.
It is slightly less optimal, but using a good doubler like the NIST JFET one
makes it reasnoble.
I think it should be manageable. Im with Bruce on this one.
Cheers,
Magnus
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list