[time-nuts] Chronometer contest sponsored by IEEE Spectrum
John Ackermann N8UR
jra at febo.com
Thu Nov 29 20:30:27 UTC 2007
David Forbes wrote:
> At 10:42 AM -0500 11/29/07, p.ross at ieee.org wrote:
>> IEEE Spectrum, the magazine of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic
>> Engineers, is issuing a D-I-Y challenge that may be of interest to the
>> members of this group. The goal is to build the most accurate possible
>> digital clock for under $100, accuracy to be measured before disciplining
>> with GPS, WWVB or other external aides. It is required that all parts be
>> generally available; for instance, you can use an OCXO (by all means!) but
>> only if it?s currently available on the open market. Display should be
>> seven-segment LEDs?we?re looking for a usable appliance, not just a
>> science project. Winner?s photo and project will be published on the
>> magazine, its Web site, or both.
>
> Phillip,
>
> That sounds like a really fun DIY project. However, this group could
> spend 3 weeks debating what is and isn't OK to do. I hope there are
> more rules than that!
Building off of David's comment (and I know there have been some others
since his...):
Cool idea that it is, I think Spectrum needs to be really careful in how
they define this contest. As David noted, the folks on this list are
capable of arguing endlessly over extraordinarily fine details, and
without carefully defining what "most accurate possible" means, more
heat than light will be generated.
Also, the requirement for LED displays is really inconsistent with the
design goal; something that uses the eye as a measurement trigger is
more limited by the interface than the resonator -- unless you're
planning to measure the accuracy over a period of years.
To get meaningful results, at a minimum you'll need to specify (a) the
temperature range over which the clock has to operate, and (b) the time
period over which the measurement will be taken.
Allowing commercial OCXOs will take away most of the challenge, as that
one element contributes almost all of the clock's frequency stability
and accuracy. I think that requiring that the oscillator start with a
discrete crystal (or other resonator), and that all temperature,
voltage, and other environmental control mechanisms be designed and
built by the submitter, would make for a really interesting competition
that encompasses both electrical and mechanical design (and craftsmanship).
John
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list