[time-nuts] Sub Pico Second Phase logger

Joseph M Gwinn gwinn at raytheon.com
Mon Dec 8 23:37:34 UTC 2008


Bruce,


time-nuts-bounces at febo.com wrote on 12/08/2008 05:53:08 PM:

> Joseph M Gwinn wrote:
> > People used passive mixers driving electromechanical stripchart 
recorders 
> > to compare high-stability oscillators in the good old days.
> >
> > One assumes that there is a purely analog approach to measurement of 
> > picosecond changes in delay at 10 MHz using a single oscillator, but I 

> > have not seen any methods described, probably because the relevant 
> > articles appeared many decades ago.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest some articles to read?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joe Gwinn
> > 
> Joe
> 
> Although one could in principle do this with a single diode double
> balanced mixer used as a phase detector all one may end up measuring is
> the effect of ambient temperature changes on the mixer phase shift.
> Lower mixer phase shift tempcos are possible if the RF port is 
> unsaturated.

Single diode?  Why wouldn't one use a standard (MiniCircuits or the like) 
four-diode two-transformer double-balanced mixer as the phase detector? 
Many mixers have IF response down to DC.


> A classical dual mixer system is probably better in that with matched
> tempco mixers maintained at the same temperature the differential phase
> shift tempco should (with careful matching) be lower.

Dual mixer as in DMTD (dual mixer time difference) would certainly work, 
but is pretty complex and temperature sensitive.

I did use a loaner Symmetricom 5120A (a full digital DMTD implementation) 
to make some measurements six months ago, and after a few days of 
continuous operation it had settled to the point that one could see 0.01 
pS changes.  (And touching one of the BNC connectors caused a 1-3 pS 
jump.)  This instrument costs about $30K, and is intended more for 
measuring phase noise and allan variance than delay changes.

Anyway, I have to wonder what people did before DMTD was invented.


> Other than the numerous classical papers on dual mixer systems and the
> occasionl NIST paper that have some mixer phase shift tempco data
> (albeit sparse), I am not aware of any specific papers.

I've read many or most of the classical DMTD papers, and have seen various 
passing estimates that diode-ring mixers have a temperature sensitivity of 
8 to 10 pS per degree C.  (I recall your figure was 10 pS/K.)  I assume 
that the DC offset also varies with themerature and drive signal 
amplitude.

 
> A purely analog approach to phase shift measurement has to be more
> difficult than a hybrid one using a pair of low frequency ADCs (eg high
> end sound card).

Is the sound-card approach workable at the millidegree to microdegree 
level, if the change is spread out over an hour?  One picosecond at 10 MHz 
is 3.6 millidegrees of phase.

Joe




More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list