[time-nuts] HP 5370B

Mike S mikes at flatsurface.com
Sat May 10 23:33:02 UTC 2008


At 04:07 PM 5/10/2008, Didier Juges wrote...
>The point is that in my 30 years experience is selling equipment to
>government and prime contractors, I have never had a piece of 
>equipment
>rejected because a reading was 1.99 for a spec of 2 max, but I have 
>seen
>many cases where an instrument reading 2.01 (or, God forbid 2.001 dB 
>as some
>can display) being argued as being unacceptable.

My mistake. If I ever used a measurement beyond it's accuracy to 
fraudulently claim compliance with customer specification, I'd quickly 
lose customers. Your business must be different.





More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list