[time-nuts] Characterising frequency standards

[Magnus Danielson]

Steve Rooke skrev:
> 2009/4/13 Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org>:
>>> But randomly throwing out data points would introduce ZDT.
>> It would introduce dead-time, it would not introduce zero dead-time
>> (ZDT). Dropping every second sample of a phase/time-error series can
>> maintain the zero dead-time property, but you loose the resolution for
>> higher taus.
> 
> First rule of posting, engage brain before typing :-) Yes, of course
> you are right Magnus and that was what I really meant.

I thought that you just made the mistake... :)

Cheers,
Magnus