[time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Racal 1992]

gsteinba52 at aol.com gsteinba52 at aol.com
Fri Aug 28 15:38:39 UTC 2009


 Can you really interpolate this information? Perhaps probable, but there is no guarantee that the tempco for this oscillator is going to be nicely linear.

Jerry




Hi Ed,

I agree with you now that I have looked at it and only assumed that it
was a typo by Racal, IE. missing out the per deg C but it could be
interpreted as you say and that would give it superior temp stability
as compared with the 04B.


Cheers,
Steve

2009/8/28 Ed Palmer <ed_palmer at sasktel.net>:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I don't know if this is a typo, but one of the copies of the 1991/1992
> manual lists the 04E temperature performance as "<= 7 x 10e-9 over the range
> of 0C to 50C". ?i.e. not per degree C. ?That would be the same as "<=1.4 e
> -10 per degree C".
>
> Could that explain the apparent contradiction of superior construction and
> inferior temperature performance? ?By the way, do you have any details on
> the superior construction?
>
> Ed






 




More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list