[time-nuts] Sound cards
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Tue Jan 13 18:48:18 EST 2009
Lux, James P skrev:
>> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
>> [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:01 PM
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sound cards
>>> Consumer audio optical links (TOSlink) are 1000 micron
>> (yes, it sounds
>>> better than 1mm) plastic fiber, which is fairly high loss
>> (1000 dB/km), which is fine for 1-2 m cables. TOSlink is
>> actually a trademark of Toshiba
>> df describes all.
>>> TOSlink has worked fine for me, except in one case, where
>> the cable was flexed a lot, and it eventually developed
>> cracks and the loss shot up.
>> Trouble is, many want some 10 m runs.
> Exactly.. I was just down in the lab, and looked at the cables we have strung all over the place, and for us, a 2m cable is positively short. An awful lot of 5m and 10m cables just patching one thing to another (consider going from a connector on a piece of equipment in one 2m high rack to a connector in another 2m rack. There's 3-4 m just in going up and down, not to mention the meter or so across, if the racks happen to be side by side.
> There ARE fancier cables and connectors in the same family that have more range, but are still pretty cheap components.
> The galvanic isolation and EMI immunity IS attractive. But, a piece of RG-58 sized coax and BNC connectors is awfully common and convenient.
On the other hand, I am used to stretch out for a 25 km or 50 km roll of
fiber. Works very well for 2,5 Gb/s or 10 Gb/s links.
The price for decent enought multimode should be more or less dirt cheap
by now, and we are talking real glas.
More information about the time-nuts