[time-nuts] Posting style Was: looking for gooddescription/generalized model for time adjustments
Mike Naruta AA8K
aa8k at comcast.net
Thu Jul 30 00:54:43 UTC 2009
Mike S wrote:
> At 07:55 PM 7/29/2009, WB6BNQ wrote...
>
>> What, exactly, is the problem with top posting ?
>
> Nothing, if you read books starting with the last chapter, working forward.
>
> Top posters are a result of the lame default of many MUAs, including MS
> Outlook, which place the insertion point for a reply at the top. Other
> than the illogical flow, most top-posters are lazy (they just hit reply
Be sure to inform your physician that he files your
medical chart incorrectly with the most recent
information on top. :)
> and start typing), and leave the entire quoted content in place, in most
> cases (I'd bet), not even realizing the full content of their email
> below their reply. Five levels of replies are not needed for context,
I think that in-line posting is the most inconvenient.
After a few message exchanges, I give up trying to
find my way through the mess.
> especially on an email reflector, where all messages go to all
> participants.
>
> By bottom posting (or better yet, inline), one is forced to go through
I sincerely hope that we're not in for a massive
discussion of bottom-posting versus top-posting.
> the text one is including for context, which encourages trimming it to a
> reasonable amount.
>
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list