[time-nuts] Thunderbolt - any negatives ?

[Robert Atkinson]

The CNS-II is very nice, but is more aligned with NTS applications than precision frequency. Also by the time you add an OCXO the cost is well over $2000. The Jackson Labs < http://www.jackson-labs.com/index.html > Fury or Firefly would be a better comparison to the Thunderbolt. Said is a regular poster here.

Robert G8RPI.

--- On Mon, 1/6/09, Jim Palfreyman <jim77742 at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Jim Palfreyman <jim77742 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - any negatives ?
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Date: Monday, 1 June, 2009, 6:14 AM
> Nice little unit and *great* value
> for money. My power supply (from the
> group buy) died - but that's another issue completely. The
> unit itself I
> have no complaints about.
> 
> However, if you have plenty of money and want to go more up
> market try a CNS
> Mark II:
> 
> http://www.cnssys.com/cnsclock/CNSClockII.php
> 
> 
> 
> 2009/6/1 Pete Lancashire <pete at petelancashire.com>
> 
> > Thanks to those that have replied. It looks like just
> about everyone
> > recommended the Thunderbolt. But before I invest ..
> any negative
> > comments ? Specs, reliability, or ?
> >
> > -pete
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>