[time-nuts] Ideas for a long-wave receiver sought
Lux, James P
james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Jun 22 12:13:01 EDT 2009
200kHz is a bit tricky for the top end.. That probably puts the standard music recording A/D out of the picture (although they have very high performance A/Ds in them, and because of large production volume, they're relatively inexpensive).
Almost any PC these days has enough processor to take a 400 ksps stream of samples and filter/decimate it.
Maybe the boards from the HPSDR folks might serve?
Do you need continuous stream of samples? One of the eval boards for high performance A/Ds with a USB might work for you, but last time I checked, they were more oriented to "capture a buffer, then analyze" sorts of approaches.
Your best long range approach might be to use a high quality A/D with a small FPGA behind it that implements a digital down converter, feeding the (lower rate after downconversion/filtering) samples through USB to an application like DL4YHF's spectrum lab. DL4YHF is very interested in VLF receiving, and he might have good ideas on inexpensive approaches.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
> [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 7:18 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Ideas for a long-wave receiver sought
> Hi Marc:
> The SDR-IQ has the ability to record everything between 500
> Hz and 190 kHz when used with a fast enough PC. This is the
> best of the SDR series for use below 200 kHz.
> It can be used with SpectraVue or Winrad.
> Works with I2PHD WINRAD, SM5BSZ LINRAD, HOKA and DRM software. See:
> Have Fun,
> Brooke Clarke
> Marc Balmer wrote:
> > Hi
> > I want to build a small, cheap, yet precise long-wave
> receiver which
> > can be tuned from the computer in the 2KHz - 200 KHz range (the
> > intended use is to receive various time signal stations).
> > Does a chip for such a receiver exist? Should I take the SDR route?
> > I designed a DCF77 receivers some years ago, but I need
> something more
> > flexible (and a bit more modern...)
> > - Marc Balmer
More information about the time-nuts