[time-nuts] LORAN-C demise

[paul swed]

Well that surely is pretty clear.
Now will DHS sign off I suspect yes

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:09 PM, ken hartman <kdhartman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Given the confusing and seemingly ambiguous infomation on the .gov site, a
> clearer picture is given by this announcement:
>
> http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/news/coast-guard-jettisons-loran-9178
>
> excerpted below:
>
> Coast Guard Jettisons Loran
> November 25, 2009
> ------------------------------
>
> The U.S. Coast Guard Commandant has formally certified that termination of
> the Loran-C signal will not adversely impact maritime navigation, signing a
> document to that effect on November 20 and forwarding it to the Secretary
> of
> Homeland Security Janet Napolitano. The first of the two criteria for
> terminating the Loran-C signal has thus been met.
>
> Anticipated next steps include a Coast Guard ALCOAST Internet message
> release on this topic, the release of the Programmatic Environmental Impact
> Statement Record of Decision, and a Federal Register Notice, all measures
> en
> route to executing the termination of the Loran-C signal.
>
> Actual termination depends upon a final determination by DHS Secretary
> Napolitano that the Loran-C infrastructure is not required as a backup to
> GPS. Until then, the Coast Guard will continue  moving towards termination
> while operating the system. If/when that determination is made, actual
> termination will take place.
> For a recent *GPS World* blog and readers' comments on this subject, see
> Wide
> Awake with No Back-Up<
> http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/wide-awake/wide-awake-with-no-back-9168
> >
> .
>
> Inevitable , but still a misguided shame.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>